Howard Blume
High-Level Salaries Approved for new top Administrators at Cash=Strapped LA Unified School District (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/05/high-level-salaries-approved-for-new-top-administrators-at-cash-strapped-la-unified.html)
LA Times
May 5th, 2011
Summary: A new administrator position has been created in the district with a pay-scale that begins at well over $137,000. The positions pay would increase to approximately $170,000 over five steps. Other LA administrators are currently making close to $200,000.
Key Points: 1) Administrators are making a lot of money.
Relevance: It is absurd to me that a new admin. position can be created out of thin air with a starting salary four times as high as that of a teacher. Teachers are being let go and admin. is expanding?
Showing posts with label School Administration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label School Administration. Show all posts
Monday, May 9, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Taming the To-Do List
Article Author name(s): Joann Rooney
Title of article: Taming the To-Do List
Title of journal: Educational Leadership
Date of publication: February 2011
Volume of the journal: 68
Issue number of the journal: 5
Article Page numbers: pp. 86-87
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/feb11/vol68/num05/Taming_the_To-Do_List.aspx
Key Points: Pervasive Busyness is a big problem for principles at schools across the nation. Multiple agendas from central and state offices place conflicting demands on principals. Too many non-essential meetings take time away from direct communication with teachers, students and parents. Principles must juggle multiple new initiatives instead of taking time for in-depth focus on any one area of emphasis. Administrators place much focus on paperwork and due dates that have little to no relationship to student learning, and are rather political necessities. Random or unexpected interruptions often take large chunks of time from a principles schedule, leading them to work excessively long weekly hours. This applies when there is a crisis situation or major student concern, which often can take up entire days to deal with.
The cure for this “pervasive busyness” is to set priorities and stick to them. This means that administrators need to learn to say “no” when necessary, be efficient at delegating tasks and must self-reflect on how their time is spent and how it can be better allotted. Stay connected to students my making effort to visit classrooms and connect with students. Delegate tasks to those trusted employees by sending them to non-essential meetings, for example. Also, make policy very clear so that teachers will be able to enforce rules among students without needing administrator assistance.
While the goal is to streamline efficiency, there are some essentials that should not be left by the wayside. Continue to learn by building a learning community with other administrators and always staying ahead of the learning. Slow down- running faster that necessary leads to poor decisions, mistakes, and forgetfulness—and ultimately wastes time. Build relationships that bring success and meaning to your work.
Relevance: This is interesting because it provides some insight as to the struggles administrator’s face, as opposed to only focusing on all of the requirements placed on teachers. It’s important to reflect that the entire system is burdened, and the current state of education is likely the result of the “trickle down effect”.
Title of article: Taming the To-Do List
Title of journal: Educational Leadership
Date of publication: February 2011
Volume of the journal: 68
Issue number of the journal: 5
Article Page numbers: pp. 86-87
http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/feb11/vol68/num05/Taming_the_To-Do_List.aspx
Key Points: Pervasive Busyness is a big problem for principles at schools across the nation. Multiple agendas from central and state offices place conflicting demands on principals. Too many non-essential meetings take time away from direct communication with teachers, students and parents. Principles must juggle multiple new initiatives instead of taking time for in-depth focus on any one area of emphasis. Administrators place much focus on paperwork and due dates that have little to no relationship to student learning, and are rather political necessities. Random or unexpected interruptions often take large chunks of time from a principles schedule, leading them to work excessively long weekly hours. This applies when there is a crisis situation or major student concern, which often can take up entire days to deal with.
The cure for this “pervasive busyness” is to set priorities and stick to them. This means that administrators need to learn to say “no” when necessary, be efficient at delegating tasks and must self-reflect on how their time is spent and how it can be better allotted. Stay connected to students my making effort to visit classrooms and connect with students. Delegate tasks to those trusted employees by sending them to non-essential meetings, for example. Also, make policy very clear so that teachers will be able to enforce rules among students without needing administrator assistance.
While the goal is to streamline efficiency, there are some essentials that should not be left by the wayside. Continue to learn by building a learning community with other administrators and always staying ahead of the learning. Slow down- running faster that necessary leads to poor decisions, mistakes, and forgetfulness—and ultimately wastes time. Build relationships that bring success and meaning to your work.
Relevance: This is interesting because it provides some insight as to the struggles administrator’s face, as opposed to only focusing on all of the requirements placed on teachers. It’s important to reflect that the entire system is burdened, and the current state of education is likely the result of the “trickle down effect”.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Panel hears bill to take state schools chief off ballot
“Panel hears bill to take state schools chief off ballot” by Donna Gordon Blankinship
The Seattle Times
Published 2/2/2011
Retrieved 2/13/2011
Complete URL: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014107319_education03.html
Intended Audience: educators, lawmakers, and the general public
Summary: Washington’s governor has proposed to create a new framework within the state’s department of education in an attempt to improve coordination between departments. In an offshoot of this proposal, lawmakers are considering the notion to turn the position of superintendent of public instruction from an elected position to that of one appointed by the governor.
Key Points: Elected vs. appointed position:
• Elected: preserves the ability of the people to elect their leaders in education; prevents any direct political influence from the governor
• Appointed: improved continuity with the lower turnover; candidates will ideally be chosen on the basis of professional ability instead of political prowess.
Relevance: Not much now, but the decision to appoint or elect the superintendent of public instruction will determine the public’s ability to vote for who they want in this position. They must decide how broken the system is, how bad it needs changing, and how much they’re willing to put this position in the governor’s hands.
The Seattle Times
Published 2/2/2011
Retrieved 2/13/2011
Complete URL: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2014107319_education03.html
Intended Audience: educators, lawmakers, and the general public
Summary: Washington’s governor has proposed to create a new framework within the state’s department of education in an attempt to improve coordination between departments. In an offshoot of this proposal, lawmakers are considering the notion to turn the position of superintendent of public instruction from an elected position to that of one appointed by the governor.
Key Points: Elected vs. appointed position:
• Elected: preserves the ability of the people to elect their leaders in education; prevents any direct political influence from the governor
• Appointed: improved continuity with the lower turnover; candidates will ideally be chosen on the basis of professional ability instead of political prowess.
Relevance: Not much now, but the decision to appoint or elect the superintendent of public instruction will determine the public’s ability to vote for who they want in this position. They must decide how broken the system is, how bad it needs changing, and how much they’re willing to put this position in the governor’s hands.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)